The SICAV model

One appeal of the SICAV as a collective investment vehicle is that it can be distinguished from contractual funds in terms of corporate governance, making it a worthwhile alternative.

Main differences between a SICAV and contractual funds:

  • A SICAV is a legal entity
  • The shareholder-entrepreneur holds liability for and influence over the management of the SICAV
  • The Board of Directors is the “face” of the SICAV
  • The Board of Directors watches over the interests of the SICAV’s investors
  • The Management and the Depositary Bank are the investor’s counterparties in a contractual fund, whereas they are only service providers for a SICAV

In general, and particularly in terms of the investment policy and restrictions, the rules are the same for both a SICAV and a contractual fund.

Each sub-fund is considered a separate collective investment scheme, with its own investment strategy and investors. The sub-funds are therefore independent of each other and are only liable for their own commitments. However, the Board of Directors, the fund management company, the custodian bank, the auditors and the fund manager are the same for all the sub-funds.